U
Unregistered
Guest
Hello there
We are starting a fledgling web design business, prompted by more than a few requests for web sites over the last few weeks. Currently, we host everything with a certain provider that claims to "host your dreams" and have done so for our own sites for the last 4 years.
However, my dreams don't consist of multiple email and site failures and security breaches, so I want to move to a better service before my renewal is up in March.
After a bit of due diligence, KH has some very good feedback from looking around the net, not to mention a small raft of very tempting deals.
However....
I am concerned about some of the things I am reading in the support areas of this forum about Wordpress sites being slow and sluggish, despite the suggestions of the reportedly excellent KH support. Since we foresee most of the work we will get as being centred around the WP CMS framework, this is a real problem if our sites will be the subject of crappy performance.
And since I want to ensure we don't oversell our hosting on whatever server we eventually buy, I'm kind of taken aback by these reports. At the moment, I don't foresee any considerably large amounts of traffic for our clients, but I want to plan to be successful for our business specific projects and not see our sites killed by stuff like "the digg effect" etc, never mind WP sluggishness issues.
So I'm really looking at two things here...
What can you say/do in order to put my mind to rest regarding the WP issues reported by other users on what appears to be an otherwise excellent hosting provider?
And...
Assuming relatively basic WP installations and about 5k page views a month, running on a CPanel based VPS or equivalent, how many customer site installations do you suggest could be fit on one of the base packages without turning the response and transmission speed to crap? (This question of course is ignoring the previous one atm...)
Make that three things...
Thinking about it, what happens when a site hosted with you becomes stupidly popular? I'm totally ok with paying for bandwidth overages and extra server provision, but I just want to know that, assuming the server and applications within it are configured and maintained correctly, nothing short of global thermonuclear war will knock the site out.
Thanking you kindly
Trefor
We are starting a fledgling web design business, prompted by more than a few requests for web sites over the last few weeks. Currently, we host everything with a certain provider that claims to "host your dreams" and have done so for our own sites for the last 4 years.
However, my dreams don't consist of multiple email and site failures and security breaches, so I want to move to a better service before my renewal is up in March.
After a bit of due diligence, KH has some very good feedback from looking around the net, not to mention a small raft of very tempting deals.
However....
I am concerned about some of the things I am reading in the support areas of this forum about Wordpress sites being slow and sluggish, despite the suggestions of the reportedly excellent KH support. Since we foresee most of the work we will get as being centred around the WP CMS framework, this is a real problem if our sites will be the subject of crappy performance.
And since I want to ensure we don't oversell our hosting on whatever server we eventually buy, I'm kind of taken aback by these reports. At the moment, I don't foresee any considerably large amounts of traffic for our clients, but I want to plan to be successful for our business specific projects and not see our sites killed by stuff like "the digg effect" etc, never mind WP sluggishness issues.
So I'm really looking at two things here...
What can you say/do in order to put my mind to rest regarding the WP issues reported by other users on what appears to be an otherwise excellent hosting provider?
And...
Assuming relatively basic WP installations and about 5k page views a month, running on a CPanel based VPS or equivalent, how many customer site installations do you suggest could be fit on one of the base packages without turning the response and transmission speed to crap? (This question of course is ignoring the previous one atm...)
Make that three things...
Thinking about it, what happens when a site hosted with you becomes stupidly popular? I'm totally ok with paying for bandwidth overages and extra server provision, but I just want to know that, assuming the server and applications within it are configured and maintained correctly, nothing short of global thermonuclear war will knock the site out.
Thanking you kindly
Trefor